PRESS RELEASE from the American
Civil Liberties Union of Virginia
December 10, 2008
Free Speech Groups Challenge Ban on
Political Attire at Polls
Richmond, VA- Three Virginia-based free speech
organizations today filed suit in federal court in Richmond against the
Virginia State Board of Elections and the general registrars of
Richmond and Fairfax County, challenging the controversial new State
Board of Elections policy prohibiting the wearing of buttons, t-shirts
and other apparel with political messages in polling places.
The Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression,
The Rutherford Institute and the ACLU of Virginia argue that the policy
violates the First Amendment rights of voters and is inconsistent with
Virginia’s electioneering statute. They are asking a federal court to
strike down the policy as unconstitutional before the next state and
local elections in 2009.
The organizations represent Jill Borak, of Fairfax County, and
Charles Epes, of Richmond. Both plaintiffs wore a campaign button or
sticker to the polls on Election Day and were told to remove them or
cover them up.
Adopted by the State Board of Elections (SBE) on October 14, the
policy interprets an existing state law against “exhibit[ing]… campaign
materials to another person” near or in a polling place as a ban on
voters’ attire that expresses a view on particular candidates or
political parties. (Click Here for SBE Policy 2008-007.)
Guidelines issued by the SBE on October 23 created confusion for
election officials and voters alike. According to the guidelines, the
new policy “is not intended to keep a qualified voter from voting.” Yet
election officials were instructed to ask voters to remove or cover
political statements that are worn as part of their attire. Voters who
refused were to be allowed to vote, but in such instances the registrar
was expected to file an incident report with the local Commonwealth’s
Attorney, presumably for purposes of proceeding with a criminal
prosecution. Violations of the law are a class 1 misdemeanor. (Click Here for SBE Guidelines.)
Telephone calls to the ACLU of Virginia and The Rutherford Institute
on Election Day indicated that the SBE policy was enforced
inconsistently by jurisdictions across the state, with election
officials having widely varying interpretations of what the policy
required.
“Election Day should be a time for celebrating the personal freedoms
guaranteed by our Constitution,” said Robert M. O’Neil, director of the
Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression. “On that
of all days, government should not be telling citizens how to express
themselves.”
“Thomas Jefferson understood that the first duty of government is to
protect the freedom of expression,” said John W. Whitehead, president
of The Rutherford Institute. “Regrettably, the State Board of Elections
shirked this important civic duty when it adopted what essentially
amounts to a dress code policy.”
“The State Board of Elections has not only misinterpreted the state
law,” said ACLU of Virginia Executive Director Kent Willis, “but in the
process it has unnecessarily and unconstitutionally banned passive
personal expression that has no history whatsoever of disrupting the
voting process.”
A copy of the complaint can be found at http://www.acluva.org/docket/pleadings/borak_complaint.pdf
Contacts:
|
Kent Willis
Executive Director
ACLU of Virginia
530 E. Main St., Ste 310
Richmond, VA 23219
804-644-8022
|
John W. Whitehead
President
The Rutherford Institute
1440 Sachem Place
Charlottesville, VA 22901
434-978-3888
|
Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression
Josh Wheeler
Associate Director
400 Worrell Drive
Charlottesville, VA 22911
434-295-4784
|
SBE
POLICY referred to above
State
Board of Elections Policy 2008-007
A meeting of the Virginia State Board of Elections was held on October
14, 2008 whereby a policy was proposed and approved by the Board:
Definition of
“exhibit other campaign material”
WHEREAS, the Code of Virginia, § 24.2-604 states, in part:
During the times the polls are open and
ballots are being counted, it
shall be unlawful for any person (i) to loiter or congregate
within 40 feet of any entrance of any polling place; (ii) within such
distance to give,
tender, or exhibit
any ballot, ticket, or other
campaign material to any person or to solicit or in any manner
attempt to influence any person in casting his vote… (Emphasis added.)
WHEREAS, the Code of Virginia does not define “exhibit;” and
WHEREAS, “In the absence of a statutory definition, the plain and
ordinary meaning of the term is controlling.” See Sansom v. Bd. of Supvrs., 257
Va. 589, (1999);
Commonwealth v. Orange-Madison Coop., 220 Va. 655, 658 (1980); 1999 Op.
Va. Att’y Gen. 10, 11; and
WHEREAS, Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “exhibit” as: “a: to
present to view: as a: to show or display outwardly especially by
visible signs or actions; b: to have as a readily discernible quality
or feature; c: to show publicly especially for purposes of competition
or demonstration;” and
WHEREAS, the Code of Virginia does not define “other campaign
material;” and
WHEREAS, Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “material” as: “the
elements, constituents, or substances of which something is composed or
can be made;” and
WHEREAS, campaign materials are materials distributed by or for
campaigns and the Code of Virginia, § 24.2-945.1, was amended in
2007 to adopt the express advocacy standard for campaign contributions
and advertisements; and
WHEREAS, courts applying the express advocacy standard have held
subject to regulation communications that cannot reasonably be
interpreted other than as expressly advocating the election or defeat
of clearly identified candidate. See
F.E.C. v. Wis. Right to Life, Inc., 127 S.Ct. 2652 (2007); Real Truth
About Obama, Inc v. FEC, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73551 (E.D. Va. Sept.
24, 2008);
WHEREAS, the Code of Virginia recognizes sample ballots may be a form
of prohibited campaign material if exhibited within the prohibited
area; § 24.2-622 states, in part:
Voters may take sample ballots into the
voting booth or enclosure, but shall not give, tender or exhibit such
ballot to any person, other than an assistant designated under §
24.2-629, while inside the polling place or within the prohibited areas
designated by § 24.2-604.
Now therefore be it
RESOLVED, by the State Board of Elections under its authority to issue
rules and regulations to promote the proper administration of election
laws and obtain uniformity in the administration of elections pursuant
to § 24.2-103, that
The phrase, “it shall be unlawful for
any person… to…exhibit… other campaign material” within the Code of
Virginia, § 24.2-604 shall be interpreted as:
No person shall show, display, or
exhibit any material, object, item, advertisement, or piece of apparel,
which has the purpose of expressly advocating the election or defeat of
a clearly identified candidate or issue.
Any person who does so shall be asked
by the officers to cease from showing, displaying or exhibiting the
material, object, item, advertisement, or piece of apparel, or to
remove or cover it until they leave the prohibited area and polling
place.
Nothing in this policy shall prohibit
any person from bringing but not exhibiting any campaign material
within 40 feet of any entrance of any polling place.
#
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS
200 N. 9th Street, Suite 101, Richmond, Virginia 23219-3497
TELEPHONE: 804-864-8901 OR
TOLL-FREE WITHIN VIRGINIA: VOICE 800-552-9745 / TDD 800-260-3466